Lingenfelter 2010 Camaro V6 Supercharger
admin
This is the Lingenfelter 2010 Camaro V6 Supercharger package now under development. We will have more information coming soon. For more information or to sign up for the Lingenfelter enewsletter go to www.lingenfelter.com
Oh Im a die hard camaro enthusiest, I was just
WillInThe04Ranger | January 15, 2010Oh Im a die hard camaro enthusiest, I was just commenting on the comment lol
women are attracted more to the camaro... its a fact.
mustangified | January 22, 2010women are attracted more to the camaro… its a fact.
This goes against EVERYTHING I believe in, but I think
Weazell | January 26, 2010This goes against EVERYTHING I believe in, but I think I’d rather have the v6 than the v8
go Mustang
mustangmikeca | January 27, 2010go Mustang
oh wow an f-body, it was cancelled because it sucked
mustangmikeca | January 27, 2010oh wow an f-body, it was cancelled because it sucked
It was canceled because peeps were too cheap to buy
Lowride24 | January 28, 2010It was canceled because peeps were too cheap to buy a real car and bought Mustangs instead.
um....no....not an f-body. and if they sucked, why is the 2010
Spikito | February 5, 2010um….no….not an f-body.
and if they sucked, why is the 2010 mustang still slower than the 98 f-body?
A 98 Camaro does 0-60 in 5.2 and the 2010
mustangmikeca | February 5, 2010A 98 Camaro does 0-60 in 5.2 and the 2010 Mustang does it in 4.9sec even the Firebird WS^ ionly matches it and it 1.1L bigger BITCH
Wow....only took 12 years to catch up.... and if you
Spikito | February 5, 2010Wow….only took 12 years to catch up…. and if you compare the 2010 mustang to the 2010 camaro it again, as usually, eats shit
The 2003 Mach 1 is faster than any F-Body at
mustangmikeca | February 5, 2010The 2003 Mach 1 is faster than any F-Body at 4.7sec 0-60 bitch
not a stock one.....5.3 buddy.
Spikito | February 5, 2010not a stock one…..5.3 buddy.
the 2003 wasnt anything close to that... if it
PaganEgyptian | February 5, 2010the 2003 wasnt anything close to that… if it was 4.7 Secs, there was a power adder. They are heavy as lead.
4.9 sec for the SVT. Thats comparing Apples to
PaganEgyptian | February 5, 20104.9 sec for the SVT. Thats comparing Apples to oranges. put 6pounds of boost on a WS6 and you have a 4 second flat FBody.
correct. My stock 99 V6 Bird was not outdone by
PaganEgyptian | February 5, 2010correct. My stock 99 V6 Bird was not outdone by much from the stock Mach 1 at the Drag Strip. I dont think Anyone was Impressed.. All Show.
10LBS of boost on a Mach 1 gets 3.8 bitch
mustangmikeca | February 5, 201010LBS of boost on a Mach 1 gets 3.8 bitch
So Motortrend is lying about getting 4.7sec in a 2003
mustangmikeca | February 5, 2010So Motortrend is lying about getting 4.7sec in a 2003 Mach 1? Look it up dumbass
Motortrend got 4.7sec0-60 in a stock 03 Mach 1, you're
mustangmikeca | February 5, 2010Motortrend got 4.7sec0-60 in a stock 03 Mach 1, you’re a dumbass if you say you’re V6 firebird was close to that
You better get your facts striaght...Motor Trend and Road and
2002blacknitews6 | February 6, 2010You better get your facts striaght…Motor Trend and Road and Track clocked the Mach 1 0 to 60 in 5.3 seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.8. And the 2002 LS1 f-body’s ran low 13’s. My stock ‘02 WS6 ran 13.2’s in 106 mph. So NO Mach 1 is faster than any stock LS1 f-body…PERIOD. Face it, the SHIT-STANG is a piece of crap. No Mach 1 runs in the 12’s stock.
It was the 2003 Cocra that ran 4.7 sec. and 12.8
2002blacknitews6 | February 6, 2010It was the 2003 Cocra that ran 4.7 sec.
and 12.8 in 1/4 mile..which had a blower.
Ford motors suck. Back in 1999 the Cobra was recalled
2002blacknitews6 | February 6, 2010Ford motors suck. Back in 1999 the Cobra was recalled cause Ford claimed the DOHC motor made 305 HP and it actually didn’t and owners were pissed, so the car was recalled and Ford installed a better intake and cams to fix the issue..lol. What a joke!!! Now the new Camaro’s V8 is as fast as a V8 GT Mustang..lol. It takes the $70,000 Shelby GT-500 to run with a 2010 SS
mustangmikeca....get your facts straight before you call anyone a dumbass.
2002blacknitews6 | February 6, 2010mustangmikeca….get your facts straight before you call anyone a dumbass. You’re the dumbass for posting BS. I got the link from MotorTrend that shows the times that i posted below, but this site won’t let me post the link.
The camaro ss should be faster moron. It does in
devilofchoice61 | February 17, 2010The camaro ss should be faster moron. It does in fact have 111 hp more than the mustang gt. Also, im pretty sure the gt500 starts at around 48K. Get your facts straight bro, lol.
wut do u think about the new unofficially named ford
knownasO | February 20, 2010wut do u think about the new unofficially named ford coyote motor?
my dream car..
90102noob | March 1, 2010my dream car..
yeah but i mean like.. the shelby is faster than
90102noob | March 1, 2010yeah but i mean like.. the shelby is faster than camaro ss. But the shelby is just like a super chard v8 version of mustang but the henasy super charged camaro ss beats the crap out of shelby.